The dangerous garbage in our midst:

Posted on May 24, 2014 by KG

Muslim man refuses to stand in court due to religion
(That’ll be the same religion which is no bar to them entering and settling in Australia.)
A MUSLIM man who threatened to “slit the throat” of an intelligence officer has refused to stand for a judge in court.
..Judge McClintock did not instruct al-Ahmadzai’s to stand but said he had noted it.
..Al-Ahmadzai had been under surveillance by the Joint Counter Terrorism Team since December 2009 because he was “allegedly committing terrorism-related offences”.
The court heard al-Ahmadzai was sentenced to five years and six months jail last year for an ATM ram-raid in 2011.
He is also charged over the attempted murder of a man at Rydalmere on May 1 last year….’
UPDATE: Col. B. Bunny, “Timeless Truths”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to The dangerous garbage in our midst:

  1. mort says:
    May 24, 2014 at 12:27

    so he has no respect for Australian law and protocol at all, save the 80k pa prison expense and just fly the fecker back where he came from, he clearly doesn’t want to remain in Australia

  2. Michael in Nelson says:
    May 24, 2014 at 14:33

    And a bit of the truth about the garbage that is Benghazi

    http://allenbwest.com/2014/05/exclusive-confidential-source-reveals-really-happened-benghazi/

  3. KG says:
    May 24, 2014 at 15:11

    ‘Gitmo Terrorists Got Better Medical Care than American Vets – The 150 Jihadis have 100 doctors and nurses assigned to them’

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/gitmo-terrorists-got-better-medical-care-than-american-vets/

  5. Mathew says:
    May 25, 2014 at 08:21

    The thing that pisses me off is the reaction from the judges and magistrates, why do they allow this crap to go on. They have the power to boot these disrespectful shits into line but they won’t do it.

    I’ll bet the judge would do a lot more than ‘note’ it if a white person or a Christian refused to stand for them.

    • Phil Stephensomn says:
      May 26, 2014 at 13:50

      As you have said, anybody else would be ruled in contempt of court. I’d like to see a couple of big burly sheriff’s officers assigned to stand either side of him, and if he doesn’t stand when required, then they can reef him up by the armpits, and make him stand. (Also, for the information of people in the U.S. reading this, “sheriff’s officer” has a different meaning in Australia from what it means over there. We follow the British system, where a sheriff is an officer of the court, and sheriff’s officers are like bailiffs in your country).