The war on men

‘The Sexodus, Part 1: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
“My generation of boys is f**ked,” says Rupert, a young German video game enthusiast I’ve been getting to know over the past few months. “Marriage is dead. Divorce means you’re screwed for life. Women have given up on monogamy, which makes them uninteresting to us for any serious relationship or raising a family. That’s just the way it is. Even if we take the risk, chances are the kids won’t be ours. In France, we even have to pay for the kids a wife has through adulterous affairs.
“In school, boys are screwed over time and again. Schools are engineered for women. In the US, they force-feed boys Ritalin like Skittles to shut them up. And while girls are favoured to fulfil quotas, men are slipping into distant second place.
“Nobody in my generation believes they’re going to get a meaningful retirement. We have a third or a quarter of the wealth previous generations had, and everyone’s fleeing to higher education to stave off unemployment and poverty because there are no jobs.
“All that wouldn’t be so bad if we could at least dull the pain with girls. But we’re treated like paedophiles and potential rapists just for showing interest. My generation are the beautiful ones,” he sighs, referring to a 1960s experiment on mice that supposedly predicted a grim future for the human race.
After overpopulation ran out of control, the female mice in John Calhoun’s “mouse universe” experiment stopped breeding, and the male mice withdrew from the company of others entirely, eating, sleeping, feeding and grooming themselves but doing little else. They had shiny coats, but empty lives.
“The parallels are astounding,” says Rupert..
…In schools today across Britain and America, boys are relentlessly pathologised, as academics were warning as long ago as 2001. Boyishness and boisterousness have come to be seen as “problematic,” with girls’ behaviour a gold standard against which these defective boys are measured. When they are found wanting, the solution is often drugs….’   (bold mine)

Update: This pretty much says it all, for me.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to The war on men

  1. KG says:

    Meanwhile, we’re supposed to take note of (and change on the basis of) arrogant, patronizing shit like this:
    http://www.what-women-want-from-men.com/traitsrealmen.html
    My reply to that crap is:
    And what are you bringing to the table, sweetie?

  2. mawm says:

    Rent, don’t buy.

    Another piece of feminist crap – and they get away with it again and again.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2014/12/03/investigation-lena-dunhams-republican-rapist-story-falls-apart-under-scrutiny

  3. Cadwallader says:

    A few years ago a book was published titled “The Dangerous Book For Boys” and it essentially harked back to those things we all did as kids in the 1950s. Rope swings, tree huts, lunacy with fireworks (my favourite) etc.. It is sad that boyish stuff is now regarded as “problematic.”
    We only had one boy in our class at primary school who played with the girls at girls games (not with the girls) he is now queer and a Bishop of the Anglican Church in Asia. Who needs to read fiction these days with a yarn like that?
    To digress a little: Do you and your readers find with advancing years that you prefer to read non-fiction as a general preference to fiction? I am making a list of books to read during my Christmas Break and the only fiction I have included is a volume of old Tennessee Williams’ short stories, alongside six non-fiction works. I am always open to suggestions as to a good read. A tip: The advertisement portion at the rear of The Skeptic magazine features a wide variety of books which are available from the Skeptics and/or Amazon.
    PS Tennessee Williams attributed his talent of assessing the human condition to his 25 years of non-sobriety.

  4. Ronbo says:

    I knew things were really changing in regards to the sexes during a visit to the University of Washington here in Seattle – I’ll wager two-thirds (or more) of the students were women, usually of Asian ancestry mostly commonly Chinese.

    Speaking of the Asians – I think told you about an incident when I was stationed in the Philippines during the 1960s, when I asked why the men sat under the shade and drank beer and played poker while their women labored under the hot sun with babies strapped to their backs in the rice paddies.

    The response from the men was, “We learned from the Americans that men should not stand in the way of the advancement of women.”

    It would appear today we in the West are finally catching up to the Asians who applied our ideas on feminism first. :mrgreen:

  5. Warren Tooley says:

    Well this is the backlash I predicted http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_bye.gif , and its happening sooner than I thought. If enough men say, hey this isn’t in my favourhttp://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_negative.gif, then the women will miss out. Only if it gets really really tough for women to find a good man, will they lower their expectations and have more to offerhttp://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_unsure.gif. The way some people I know did it, is they didn’t have children until they had been married for 5 years. The couple, they both worked, earnt money, paid their part of the rent. And then as that was going well, finally years after they decided to have children. So it was a solid relationship first, their was no trick of I’ll have children and then leave himhttp://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_mail.gif. The understanding was your with me, you’ll do your part, and there’s no guarantee of children.

    Out of these people who did it this way, I can say one has had a happy marriage for 14 years so far. The other has had relationships with no children or alimony. Ultimately as men just hide away from females, females will have to expect less, or miss out. Although the people who set up feminism are doing it to depopulate the earth. Section 11 of the earth charter says what women are entitled to. Why is that in the earth charter? Depopulating the earth will save the earth, according to these people, so Ronbo now you know what feminism is all about, destroying families with the equality hoax. If enough people find out maybe we can change course.

    • andy5759 says:

      Earth Charter? Is this Agenda21 wearing dungarees? I’ll have to have a look at this thing, Earth Charter – for fuc*k’s sake gimme a break.

      I am a pretty normal bloke, sixty years old, in reasonable financial health. I have never married nor have fathered children. The women I pursued seemed to put their careers and bodies before breeding. My loss, their loss, who fucki*ng cares? The best northern European breeding stock isn’t breeding, so we import people to populate our country for us. Trouble is, the fucker*s they bring in are worse than our worst breeding stock. I need a pint.

  6. Warren Tooley says:

    The other possibility, is this is a way of taking stability out of the family. The woman is a nurtured who brings warmth. The man brings discipline, stability and growth. By splitting the family, and having the women take care of the child, you’ve taken the backbone out of the family. So now the government can be tyrannical, with no resistance.

    Who thought this up? The third plank of the communist manifesto says abolish inheritances. So you have children growing up dependent on government. A very scary world.

  7. KG says:

    I think you answered your own question, Warren:
    “The third plank of the communist manifesto says abolish inheritances. So you have children growing up dependent on government.”

  8. KG says:

    I’m blessed in being married to a woman (30+ years) who is as enraged by the war on men as much as I am.
    She regards metrosexual, snivelling pansies with contempt and radical feminists with real hatred. Real women don’t need that crap.

    • andy5759 says:

      There’s loads of these new “lumbersexual” men about. Beards, rugged clothing, feminised opinions, utter twats.

  9. Cadwallader says:

    O/T I just got a call from my wife in the Peoples Republic of Western Australia to say that our stamp duty bill for a apartment of her dreams is $AUD 41,700!!! FFS!!! The property is not palatial in fact quite modest. Talk about a tax on one’s dreams. I could damn nearly buy a house in Dannevirke for that sum without stamp duty. MPs never revoke a tax on a matter of principle they only do it when it is too hard to collect. To quote Warren Zevon*:”Send Lawyers Guns And Money….the shit has hit the fan.”

    WZ was a good bugger of the first order. He has been dead for a decade now.

    • Ronbo says:

      My people did a revolution over the stamp tax…

      I hope I’m not giving guys in Oz any rebel ideas….just say’n :mrgreen:

      • Cadwallader says:

        In NZ Stamp Duty was removed in 2 stages: Domestic property was exempted in 1986 and commercial about 10 years later. This sounds great unless you approach all taxes as a bizarre form of theft. Which indeed I do.
        Compared to Australia, NZ is a tax haven as we have no Death Duty, Gift Duty, aforesaid Stamp Duty, Capital Gains Tax (and thanks to the recent election campaign by the Left unlikely to in the foreseeable future.)

        • KG says:

          I must be the lone voice here in favour of a capital gains tax.
          Well, at least no more anti it than any other form of taxation…….it would at least slow down real estate speculators.

  10. mistress mara says:

    Progressive Liberals, dis-female, dis-male and the 15 other genders (spit) will not be content until all males behave like disabled, fucking fairies. For the sake of my mental health, I have stopped wondering why so many people are so heroically stupid. !!