THE DAMNATION OF WESTERN ELITES – FAYE, ON FATE AND FUTURISM

A guest post by the esteemed Seneca III:  (any faults in the format are mine. kg)
THE DAMNATION OF WESTERN ELITES – FAYE, ON FATE AND FUTURISM
Preamble.
Previously this blog posted an article ‘The Quest for the Soul of Europe’ (10th July) by Simon Wolfe of the Iron Legion. Subsequent to comments appended to that article SW posted an elaboration of his thoughts on the matter (11th July). In the comments thereafter ‘Wombat’ quoted from the work of Edmund Burke – “Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents” – which he, Wombat, preceded with the sub-heading “Who can address the matter more eloquently?” This is my reply to that question.
N.B. The introduction, footnotes and my comments hereinafter are in italics for ease of differentiation only, not emphasis.

Introduction.
With a doctorate in Political Science from Paris’ Institute of Political Science Guillaume Fay was one of the principal theoreticians of the French ‘Nouvelle Droit’ in the 1970’s and 80’s, prior to his developing an empathy with the Identitarian movement. He has also been a journalist at Figaro-Magazine, Paris-Match, Magazine-Hebdo and Valeurs Actuelles.
Of his many books and publications two of his most seminal contributions to our survival dialectic are available in English language editions: ‘Why We Fight’ A and ‘Archeofuturism’. B
All abstracts in this article are from his METAPOLITICAL DICTIONARY which constitutes the main thrust of ‘Why We Fight’ – although I would describe it as more of an encyclopaedia than a dictionary.
I have abstracted the Archeofuturism definition from that dictionary, but I have left it without comment or elaboration for it is a concept that demands a far fuller treatment than can be afforded within the space limitations of this paper.

A Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance by Guillaume Faye. Arktos Media Ltd (2011), ISBN-10: 1907166181 (Paperback)
B Archeofuturism: European Visions of the Post-Catastrophic Age by Guillaume Faye (Author), Michael O’Meara (Foreword). Arktos Media Ltd (2010), ISBN-10: 1907166092. (Paperback)

Abstracts.
“ETHNIC CHAOS
A historical situation in which a people or civilisation loses its ethnic basis due to the mass immigration of aliens.
Ethnic chaos was a factor in the decomposition of the Roman Republic and Empire, Pharaonic-Egyptian civilisation and many ancient Greek cities. Europe is presently in the grip of a colonising settlement by overseas peoples. A civilisation disappears once it loses its original ethnic basis. It becomes a patchwork quilt in which any idea of a city, community and destiny is impossible.
Ethnic chaos signals the pure and simple disappearance of a people and a civilisation – and of true democracy – as all of the classical Greek philosophers warned.
An ethnically heterogeneous population – a kaleidoscope of communities – becomes an anonymous society, without soul, without solidarity, prone to incessant conflicts for domination, to an endemic racism (‘every multi-racial society is a multi-racist society’) – ungovernable because there’s no shared vision of the world. Ethnic chaos is an open door to tyranny.
In the name of multi-racialism, capitalism and democracy have made ethnic chaos part of their programme. Men are stripped of their attachments and remade as consumers, each interchangeable with other, each without an identity.1 But this is stupid. Man never actually loses his memory or ancestral identity. A society of ethnic chaos leads in the long run not to prosperity, harmonious individualism or republican rule, but to political and social disorder. We’re now catching the first glimpses of this chaos. From it there will perhaps come the post-chaos – that is regeneration – a return to homogeneity.”
1 The destruction of personal identity is the first step undertaken by a self-selected few who use their grip on the levers of power to dominate and direct human affairs in their own interests rather than that of the body politic which they should be serving. By reducing all down to the level of the lowest common denominator they intend to create a passive and thus easily controllable global Slave State or, by another definition, The New World Order.

“POST-CHAOS
Chaos is that state of disorganisation and anarchy affecting a collectivity of any sort once it’s beset by catastrophe. The post chaos is that phase when a new order is constructed on the basis of a revolutionary metamorphic logic. It’s the eternal cycle of life, death and rebirth as expressed in Nietzsche’s theory of the eternal return of the identical 2 as well as in René Thom’s 3 theory of catastrophes. The society we know can’t be fixed, the system can’t be saved. This is the illusion of every conservative tendency. The sole solution to the present situation will come from chaos – from civil war, economic depression etc. – that overthrows established mentalities and makes acceptable and indispensable that which was previously unimaginable. Only in situations of chaos are the given variables changed and does it become possible to establish another order – the post-chaos. Only in crisis, then, will a solution be found 4. To construct a new home, it’s first necessary that the old one collapses. It’s not a pessimist but a realist who sees this.”
2 Friedrick Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Cambridge University Press (2001), pp. 194. This is one of Nietzsche’s central propositions.
3 René FrédéricThom (1923-2002) was a renowned French mathematician. He was principally a topologist and singularity theorist (and winner of the Fields Medal) but later moved on to become the founder of Catastrophe Theory.
4 Having been born into and raised in what was then a reasonably functional democracy it has taken me most of a long lifetime to come to accept that such a thing no longer exists, and to finally throw off my innate unease at the use and the objectives of the terms ‘revolution’ and ‘revolutionary’. Now, having recently tried one last time to bring about a recovery of that old status quo via the ballot box, and having failed abysmally, I am now convinced that that avenue is irretrievably blocked.
At the onset this painful transition of mine presented me with a moral dilemma, a dilemma which prevailing circumstances forced me to resolve by finally accepting that only one alternative course of action remains open. And, eventually, I came to the conclusion that that course of action should not be simply in the form of ‘resistance’ because whilst resistance is often said to be futile, it is much more than that – it is wholly counter-productive in the sense that it only delays the inevitable chaos and thus the post-chaos opportunity for re-birth, and that the longer such an inevitability is delayed the more difficult will be the reconstruction.
“IDENTITY
Etymologically: ‘That which makes similar.’ A people’s identity is that what makes it incomparable and irreplaceable.
Characteristic of humanity is the diversity and singularity of its many peoples and cultures. Every form of homogenisation is synonymous with death, as well as with sclerosis and entropy. Universalism always seeks to marginalise identity in the name of a single, unique anthropological model. But ethnic and cultural identities form a block: maintaining and developing the cultural heritage presupposes a people’s ethnic commonality.
Humanity will not survive the challenges it’s if it remains a pluriversum, that is, if it remains a fractious aggravation of profoundly different ethnocentric peoples.
Look: identity’s basis is biological 5 ; without it, the realms of culture and civilisation are unsustainable. Said differently: a people’s identity, memory and projects come from a specific hereditary disposition.”
5 I am of the opinion that when the established and well proven moral and genetic value of the traditional heterosexual family structure is superseded by institutionalised deviance, when such deviance becomes the norm and the norm becomes deviance, then the biological basis of our identity, culture and civilisation will no longer exist.

“ALIENS
Within a given population, those who are culturally and biologically of non-indigenous origin.
Today it would be better to talk of aliens (allogénes) than if immigrants born in Europe of non-European parents, insofar as the majority of them are not ethnically European, but are considered ‘nationals’ solely on the basis of jus soli. 6 Since Antiquity, as Aristotle, Thucydides and Xenophon noted, it’s been known that every nation that takes in large numbers of aliens is destined to perish, for these aliens progressively replace natives, who are culturally and/or physically destroyed by them. Such a process is underway now in France. 7
At the beginning of the Twenty-first century, the notion of alien has lost all currency in Europe, either legally, linguistically or nationally. The law, though, should designate every resident not of European origin as an alien. A Belgian, Italian or Russian of European origins residing in France is not an alien. The key point is that a people submerged by aliens eventually becomes a minority, strangers in their own land. Such is the logic of the colonisation we’re now experiencing. In the end, the alien becomes the native. 8 ”
6 Fr. ‘birthright citizenship’
7 And everywhere else in the Euro/Anglosphere.
8 I note history amply demonstrates that once Muslims are given democratic rights and authority within a territory they are in the process of occupying they will use those rights and that authority to gradually abrogate those rights and authority of the original inhabitants. Thus when it’s in an absolute minority Islam will incessantly demand more and more minority rights. When it becomes a significant minority the pace and intensity of its demands will accelerate exponentially. Then, once Islam becomes a majority within any socio-political or geographic environment, at local or national level, or it finds itself close to becoming one, there will be no more minority rights – for anyone. That is when the original inhabitants will cease to exist.
“ARCHEOFUTURISM
The attitude that approaches the future in terms of ancestral values, believing that notions of modernism and traditionalism need to be dialectically transcended.
Archeofuturism opposes both modernity seeing them a versos of one another and believing that modernity is backward looking having failed to realise either its ideals of great projects. Techno-science, for example, is incompatible with humanity’s humanitarian and egalitarian values. The Twenty-first century will see the resurgence of struggles that bourgeois and Western cosmopolitan ideology thought it had long buried; identitarian, traditionalist and religious conflicts; geopolitical fissures; ethnic questions posed at the planetary level; battles over scarce resources.”
——————————————————————————
Conclusion:
These could well be the times that try men’s souls. How we respond individually and collectively will determine the course of our immediate and long term future. And those of our descendants, if any.
Afterthought – a personal philosophy:
I can think of no better path for a man or a woman to tread than to join together, one with the other, within the bosom of their own culture and community in order to love, care, support and protect their union, by any means at their disposal no matter how demanding, and to beget and do the same for their children so that their vigorous genetic inheritance is passed on and carries forward into the future. That really is immortality, and it has nothing to do with Islam or virgins no matter in what numerical quantity the latter are presumed to be found. Moreover, whilst Muslims do so conjoin similarly, even though often in multiplicands of our predilection for singularity in this area of human relationships, one factor determines their fundamental weakness rather than their strength.
To our everlasting advantage Islam’s fourteen centuries of a closed, genetically destructive, tribally driven predominately consanguineous reproduction system is, in the final analysis, its own nemesis. Such a primitive social imperative, throughout human history or that of the animal world, always translates into a terminal state of negative hybrid vigour, a cul-de-sac, the epitome of evolutionary regression rather than progression. And this, in a nutshell, is Islam, the culture we are now beset and belaboured with, one gifted to us in the West by a morally corrupt, venal cabal of acquisitive predators – our own governing classes and their indoctrinated media and executive arms.
Yet the universe continues on its course, and as Islam persists in indulging itself in its painful and gruesomely extended death throes, in its recent but far from historically unique barbaric manifestations, in frenzied ideological orgasms of atrocity and destruction through which it chooses to express its hopes of a continued existence and ultimate dominance, we must somehow prevail. Islam knows no better, nor ever will, but we must find a way.
If we are to survive this tsunami of primitivism we must take hold of this, our small advantage, post haste, accelerate it and utilise it to our survival benefit. No more, no less. We must sustain whatever the cost or how history will view us. The price will be high, but such was it ever so.

Seneca III, Middle England, July 11th, 2015.