New Zealand:

Posted on April 13, 2016 by KG

The U.N.’s socialist poodle, even under National – the so-called alternative to the left. If Labour was in charge, what would be different?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to New Zealand:

  1. Mike Webber says:
    April 13, 2016 at 20:59

    Nothing.

  2. Ronbo says:
    April 13, 2016 at 21:13

    “If Labour [ The Hard Left] was in charge, what would be different?”

    What’s the difference between death by fire or water?

    The death by fire is quicker, but just as painful as slowly drowning to death.

  3. Lara says:
    April 14, 2016 at 00:18

    just so so predictable!!

  4. The Gantt Guy says:
    April 14, 2016 at 05:34

    Even socialist Labour under Dear Leader Clark, didn’t cozy up to the faux-natives the way socialist National have.

    Apart from that, I confess to be perplexed.

    The article says New Zealand’s rulers want to have a “low emissions economy”. They then say more than half of the “emissions” come from agriculture, and the fix is (1) buy indulgences from the priesthood, (2) make cuts in the “transport sector” (make it harder for producers to get goods to market and for people to move around) and (3) encourage electric vehicle uptake.

    I’m not sure of the link between the two, but then I guess I may have gone in on the assumption this whole programme was about something other than complete government control of society.

    • KG says:
      April 14, 2016 at 06:40

      “.. I guess I may have gone in on the assumption this whole programme was about something other than complete government control of society.”
      8O
      And while you were on this drug, you also saw fluffy unicorns and rainbows, didn’t you?