Perhaps the reason this 5 minute but succinct video has only 440K views over 4 months is that it includes the first minute of an hysteric refusing to shut-up.
In order to help, I’ve queued this past that.
(After viewing it, run it from the start and then tell me my suspicions are ill-founded.)
The hysterical woman is a perfect example of how this has gone along for so long. By trying to force her emotions as the foremost argument in favor of CAGW, the intent is to force the public to tolerate her and her fears and always go along with her. The media provides her and her ilk all the microphones they wish while DENYING a microphone to people with rational counter arguments. This proves that the real deniers are on the Left. Once again they are projecting. The only solution is to try and convey sound logic as is displayed here to all that still will listen.
For BELIEVERS in CAGW, there is no hope. You can throw facts all day at religious nuts and they will not listen. This is not for their benefit, it is for yours.
What is needed is stripping away any sort of cover for the scammers at every chance we get. Such as the words of this man.
The words of this man at the end of the piece is why I labeled this post as I have. Paraphrasing: The banks of the United States and of the world would NOT be funding millions of dollars for each ocean front dwelling in Florida if even the lowest forecasts of ocean rise were in any way credible.
Thus the real money of the world, which has helped finance the scam from the start, expose what they really believe. “Fear Mongering Catastrophic Climate Change is 100% Scam!”
Now I want all to really look at the beginning of this video. This little video is a microcosm of how the media have been able to indoctrinate so many people. At about 1 minute 15 seconds the show’s director cut off the microphone of the hysterical woman so the rational guy could speak.
When was the last time SSM allowed such a thing on the climate “debate?” Don’t all answer at once. LOL
I loved the part about him telling Gore he was jealous for not thinking up the scam first.
Dan Pena is one of the best teachers of creating wealth out there – very honest and straight forward man… he tells it like it is with out big words and complicated explanations – this video being an example… just the plain truth.
Here is a truth I have learned – and you can chose not to believe it if you like, but, banks all have their own intel branches – just like countries. Banks know who is going to war, and who is going to win, who needs money and who will get it, they know what companies to invest in and what countries to invest in, they know what currencies to invest in, and when to drop them… they know… banks are international all over the world under different names – in Mexico Banamex is Citygroup in the US… Bancomer is BBVA from Spain (Compass in the states)… They are all over the world running various branches under different names and they know everything that happens in the countries they are in and have very close ties to the men that matter in those countries – just the way it is, and they report back all intel to home office so the plans and strategies can be put into place for whatever situation.
It is no conspiracy theory just the plain and simple truth – I am sure you have all heard how the Rothchilds had their own spies inform them back in London that Napoleon was defeated before the government knew, allowing them to spread the opposite news resulting in a selling panic that allowed them to buy everything up on the cheap…. absolutely genius.
Victor, I’d never run into Dan Peña before now. This video turned up as a suggestion after another video I was watching ended. I’m glad to hear you hold him in high regard.
Good to see you Victor!
This is the first I have heard of Pena too,but count me as a new follower.
hey, I am always around watching from my dark little corner… I check this site everyday (unless I am out in the bush).
This man has lots of videos out with some common sense stuff that really no one thinks about – there is a video where he talks about electric cars and gives it to you straight… if the world wanted electric cars we would all be driving electric cars by now, and he is right, we have always had the technology and the first cars built were electric… but who will loose money on a deal like that… bug oil, and they ain’t about to give it all up.
And I have to agree with the comments about his language – though I curse all the time – for some one in his position, he doesn’t need it but I have always known him to be that way… is it part of his schtick, or just the way he is? don’t know but he is passionate, he is rich, and does not care about our opinion of him… I myself show no mercy to the modern world and the new world faggots in it, but with my tribe and my friends I hold back on the cursing, and it is not hard to tell when I am holding back… it’s how you know I respect you… I did also like that bit about “I wish I had come up with that scam” – I am still trying to come up with something to sell to the ANTIFA and the left… if I could just come up with some new victim group and sell bracelets for them or a foundation and take up donations.
Victor, I know for sure that the idea of banks having their own intelligence organisations isn’t paranoia.
They’ve been behind funding operations by organisations such as Sandline International for years.
I knew you would get what I’m saying, KG.
Not much impressed by the language but the message was darned clear and the bank lending a great thing to raise. The lending argument is supported by the New Zealand experience after the Christchurch earthquakes where insurers quickly became very nervous and insurability became a serious barrier to house buying with the consequence that you couldn’t borrow if you couldn’t insurer. The banks were looking after their interests for sure although that does not always prevent them doing dumb stuff.
Brown, I agree the coarse language is less than desirable. In the age of Trump we can expect more coarseness not less. More of us need to return to the old standards. It wasn’t that hard for me to paraphrase it into what I hope in more effective language. Let us hope that those who tell others about the banks still backing ocean front properties use language more along the lines I offered.
Most of all, I hope we learn the other lessen of this video. The media got away with this emotional approach to shut down opposition to the CAGW fraud, and tried to get away with the same technique after the shootings at the Parkland gun-free zone, making a celebrity out of that Hogg. We need to point out all the access to microphones given Hoggs and none provided to freemen.
I may be a bit rougher around the edges than most here,but I didn’t mind the language.We on the right have been far too polite for far too long.We are in a war of ideas and if we lose this war a little foul language is the least of our worries.
Polite conversation among friends is no place for such language I admit,but if the shock value of loud profanity helps us red pill the hysterically ignorant back into reality,then so be it.
One of his points was what we were taught in law class. You must disclose all relevant facts of the deal, or the contract is null and void. All the foreseeable facts, meaning everything that you are aware of.
Over here if you don’t its called misleading conduct. In America its called fit for purpose.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-315
If it doesn’t achieve the purpose it is bought for the seller is a law breaker. So those selling real estate are law breakers if they don’t state that it will last for less than the life of a mortgage.
So let’s take these people to court then…if only justice existed.
‘if only justice existed.”
It doesn’t and it probably never will. Just another unattainable ideal, except in rare individual cases – and those usually outside the law.
Ocean front dwelling .
https://www.rt.com/uk/425683-cracks-nuclear-huntingtonb-scotland/
Only 7 meters above sea level.
And it is not the only one.
even the lowest forecasts of ocean rise were in any way credible.