“Muslims go to Western Countries not for a better way of life but their way of life in a better country!”

Posted on October 27, 2011 by KG

Via Andrew Bolt:
‘Mark Steyn on an honour killing in Canada which the media can barely bring itself to mention:
This is a world in which a father and mother sit around the kitchen table with their son plotting how to kill their three daughters. At a certain level, such people are not fully human.
But they are fully Canadian, at least in the legal sense. They came to Quebec from Afghanistan in 2007. And, for all the sympathetic media murmurings about the difficulties of transitioning from a highly traditional culture to a First World society, the Shafias did find certain uses for modernity: In planning the killing of his sisters, Hamed used a Google search – “where to commit a murder”…’

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to “Muslims go to Western Countries not for a better way of life but their way of life in a better country!”

  1. Darin says:
    October 27, 2011 at 14:41

    No death penalty in Canada means no justice,not that there would be any for the Muslim pig f–kers anyway.Hope the bastards get sucked into a limb shredder-slowly :evil:

  2. Oswald Bastable says:
    October 27, 2011 at 14:55

    Dragging us down to the bottom denominator- one fucking colonist at a time!

  3. Kris K says:
    October 27, 2011 at 16:53

    Honour Killings: the ultimate reason why Muslims will never, and indeed should never, become ‘genuine’ citizens of Western first-world nations.

    Islam should be compulsorily renounced prior to receiving immigration or refugee status approval.

    • Richard says:
      October 28, 2011 at 21:27

      Kris, there’s one problem with your idea: taqiyya. You can’t trust such a renunciation. The “prophet” has, with his vile system, painted us all – Muslims and non-Muslims alike – into a corner. The end result will be as horrifying as it is inevitable.

      • Kris K says:
        October 29, 2011 at 07:32

        I agree, Richard – but renunciation would be a good place to start. “Taqiyya” and “Kitman” are yet other evils of Islam that the average punter in the street is totally ignorant of.

        As a Christian I believe the ONLY genuine way for a Muslim to be purged from the satanic death cult of Islam is for him to embrace and receive Christ as his Lord and Saviour. Anything less is likely, as you highlighted, to be little more than lip-service and telling the infidel what he wants to hear.

        Of course getting our largely atheistic politicians in the West to acknowledge the spiritual component of Islam would be a bridge too far I suspect.

        • KG says:
          October 29, 2011 at 07:36

          “…the ONLY genuine way for a Muslim to be purged from the satanic death cult of Islam is for him to embrace and receive Christ as his Lord and Saviour.”

          I have an infallible way to purge them–either a few grains of Pb@2000fps or do it in bulk–with twenty megatons of Instant Sunshine.(tm) :evil:

          • Kris K says:
            October 29, 2011 at 07:51

            That’s option two if option one fails. And the reality is is that it will likely come down to option two [in a global sense] in the not too distant future. The Good Book hints at as much.

            Fasten your seatbelt, we’re in for a rough ride.

  4. mort says:
    October 27, 2011 at 19:19

    Dirtbag pieces of shit.
    here is a historical counter to this barbarism

    A story for which Napier is often noted involved Hindu priests complaining to him about the prohibition of Sati by British authorities. This was the custom of burning a widow alive on the funeral pyre of her husband. As first recounted by his brother William, he replied:
    “Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs.”

  5. mara says:
    October 28, 2011 at 08:38

    You are a bit of a worry Darin, but in the context of this story, I would have to concur. :shock:

    • Darin says:
      October 28, 2011 at 09:49

      Worry?My only worry is if a hard headed liberal got sucked in by mistake it might dull the knives and those things ain’t cheap :shock:

  6. WAKE UP says:
    October 28, 2011 at 09:06

    Nothing pisses me off more than these primitive apes using modern methods to go back to the stone age. ( The dynamiting of the Bamiyan statues is another example: they should be forced to rebuild them by the original methods. )

  7. WAKE UP says:
    October 28, 2011 at 09:13

    And this ! (from Mark Steyn reporting on the honour killing trial):

    “On Fridays, the judge told the jurors, the lunch schedule will be shifted so the interpreters, all male, can get to mosque for prayers.”

    Sheesh.

  8. mara says:
    October 28, 2011 at 15:32

    It is profoundly depressing to realize that most people either don’t know about this stuff or are so brainwashed or undereducated in history, that they don’t really care or know the significance of it. Where is the cowardly feminist movement now? All worn out spending 30 years telling me to not shave my legs or wear a bra? Wow!
    :sad: :sad: :sad:

    • Darin says:
      October 28, 2011 at 21:40

      “Where is the cowardly feminist movement now? ”

      The modern feminist movement isn’t about lifting Women up,but rather about tearing Men and family life in general down.

      Our Grandmothers and Great Grandmothers who struggled to get equal rights would be turning in they’re graves at this article.

  9. KG says:
    October 29, 2011 at 07:39

    “The modern feminist movement isn’t about lifting Women up,but rather about tearing Men and family life in general down.”
    Absolutely. The original battles have all been won and the rancid diehards are left only with a rotten ideological project to sustain them and justify their existence.