‪What if Freedom is a Myth?‬

Well, Wabbit believes it is, and voting merely legitimises and reinforces the myth, allowing the charade of  ‘representative government’ to continue. The Woodpile Report carries this video clip which supports that view.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to ‪What if Freedom is a Myth?‬

  1. Redbaiter says:

    You’re right KG. When there is only Communist Party One and Two, and a few waffling subsidiaries, what’s the point?

  2. KG says:

    Perhaps what’s needed is a ‘Masada moment’….something I may expand on in a rant. ;-)

  3. KG says:

    O/T, we went on a trip today, purely on impulse to Cooma and the Snowys, coming back via Gundagai on the Hume highway. Quite a nostalgia fix… :grin:

  4. Robertvdl says:

    It looks like if we need a new world war . But who is the enemy. Not other normal small people in other countries. The enemy are the dictators, the elite in our own country. It’s time for another France revolution. all over the globe. We don’t need Kings.

    http://cbullitt.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/barack_obama_the_french_sun_king.jpg

  5. The Gantt Guy says:

    Freedom, at least in New Zealand, is as fleeting as a politician’s whim. The only ‘rights’ and ‘freedoms’ guaranteed New Zealanders are those articulated in the Bill of Rights Act 1990, which can be amended at any time by a simple majority vote – it doesn’t even need a super-majority! At least the US Constitution has it the other way around in that it articulates the government’s powers, assuming people are inherently free. Of course it relies on politicians complying with it’s requirements as opposed to using it for toilet paper as the Obamas are doing, but at least it provides some basis for hope!

  6. Richard says:

    With apologies to “Me and Bobby McGee”:
    Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose,
    Nothing, that’s all the Bill of Rights left me, yeah.

  7. The Revolutionaries of 1776 had a motto-because the Founders knew that inherited ‘royalty’ always lead to tyranny-
    Motto- No King But KING JESUS–
    They meant it then-I mean it now–
    Those in our Govt and those behind the scenes ($$$$$ -power) believe they are ‘royal’—It is time for Freedom lovers to stand and march forward–
    and for us in the US to claim the original intent of the Constitution to be our earthly guide…
    for freedom lovers in NZ and Australia to stand firm via your Founding documents…
    Carol-CS

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      Sadly Carol, the founding document we have in New Zealand has been so deliberately misinterpreted over the past 20 years it is no longer worth the parchment it was printed on. Somehow a document which guarantees all citizens have the same rights and privileges and been so deliberately twisted that one sub sector or society has their own seats in the Parliament, their own education system, their own welfare system.

  8. Robertvdl says:

    How They Brainwash A Nation

    “This amazing interview was done back in 1985 with a former KGB agent who was trained in subversion techniques. He explains the 4 basic steps to socially engineering entire generations into thinking and behaving the way those in power want them to. It’s shocking because our nation has been transformed in the exact same way, and followed the exact same steps.”

    http://youtu.be/qvoZCtpYCRI

  9. Orion says:

    I think we in the commonwealth nations need to revisit the Magna Carta, and give it an amendment in the vein of Thomas Jefferson, who said we need to water the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants every once in a while.

    Or words to that effect.

    In any case, I think what the world is going to look like after everything breaks up and then settles down again, is communities of interest forming nation states. The exact opposite of multi-culturalism, people will refuse to form a political entity with someone who doesn’t share the same core values as them. I’m not saying this as a positive thing, just my prediction.

  10. KG says:

    “The exact opposite of multi-culturalism, people will refuse to form a political entity with someone who doesn’t share the same core values as them.”
    I think it would be a very positive thing indeed. Because any political entity which tries to incorporate anything other than shared values is tyranny, doomed to fail.