Easily fixed–go back to Myanmar.

Posted on November 14, 2013 by KG

‘AN ASYLUM seeker is being forcibly separated from her sick newborn baby for 18 hours a day.
Latifa, 31, from Myanmar was moved off Nauru to give birth last week. Her baby, who had a caesarean delivery, is still in hospital with respiratory problems but she is only allowed to visit him for 6 hours a day….’        source
Firstly, she’s bloody lucky to get world class hospital treatment at the Australian taxpayer’s expense. Second, if she’s an “asylum seeker” and not simply an illegal immigrant I’ll eat my hat. Third, since when was Latifa a Burmese name? Chances are she isn’t from Myanmar at all.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Easily fixed–go back to Myanmar.

  1. Darin says:
    November 14, 2013 at 12:24

    “Her baby, who had a caesarean delivery, is still in hospital with respiratory problems”

    That’s some baby to undergo a C-section while enduring a chest cold :shock: :roll:

    Ya,like you say,both mother and child would most likely be dead if not for the kindness Australian CITIZENS bestowed on them.

  2. Michael in Nelson says:
    November 14, 2013 at 14:33

    Well KG, you seem to have the fix for this problem. What do you suggest NZ do with judges that meet out sentences like this

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11157257

  3. thor42 says:
    November 14, 2013 at 17:05

    Latifa – definitely a headbag-wearer name.
    Put the bitch on a fishing-boat, tie a concrete block to her ankle and drop her over the side. Problem solved.

    As for the other boats carrying dozens of these scum – use them for torpedo practice.

  4. Seneca III says:
    November 15, 2013 at 00:43

    ‘Latifa’ is an Arabic name loosely transliterated as gentle one. It is also a derivative variant of the Arabic Khetifa meaning flowering or blossoming. The name of the baby is even more indicative of where this family’s loyalties lie and their real objective (welfare Jihad?). Farus is a variant spelling of Faris, also Arabic, that can variously be interpreted as warrior/horseman/knight etc. according to the Taqqiya needs of the moment (Jihadi?, Shaheed? – in the mad, mad world of Islam any word can mean anything they want it to mean and whatever the meaning it doesn’t well for us Kuffars.)
    Whatever, she/they may or may not be from Myanmar but they sure as hell are not Buddhists, and the odds are about even that the husband’s name is Mohammed, or a diminutive thereof. Good luck Australia Fair, and welcome to the club.
    http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_negative.gif

    • Ronbo says:
      November 15, 2013 at 06:01

      I can’t believe Australia’s immigration policies these days :!: –

      I well remember 1970 when I filled out the paperwork to become an Australian citizen at the embassy in Washington, D.C. , I was told that only English speaking whites were welcome in OZ – and not only that – I was required to have a profession and funds to support myself while I looked for a job, a clean criminal record, and be in good physical condition. :shock:

      At the end of a tedious process that lasted weeks, I was deemed acceptable for immigration to Australia, but my mother blew a gasket at the thought of her eldest son leaving the States – and so I didn’t get on that plane. :cry: