to justify appeasing muslims:
‘Man ban at public pool
Under a proposal being worked on by city council staff, men could be excluded from the Gallagher Aquatic Centre during twice-weekly women-only swimming sessions.
…The programme could also be introduced at Waterworld’s hydrotherapy pool if there was sufficient demand, and reflected council’s desire to be “as inclusive as possible”, Bayliss said.
“One group we would like to involve in the proposed sessions would be women who have been displaced from war-torn or developing countries, where they simply have not had the chance to swim safely or even had access to a pool.
“We believe there is a demand, particularly among ethnic communities.”..’
Read the whole thing, then weep at the comments….gutless, uninformed, ignorant brainwashed pc assholes who don’t have the faintest idea what the word “dhimmi” means.
The word “inclusive” as used by the council prick is a sick, lying joke. How can excluding male ratepayers–who paid for the fucking facility–possibly be described as “inclusive”? It doesn’t matter if it’s for one hour a week or twenty, the principle is the same.
A whole lot of Kiwis can’t wait to bend over and take it up the ass from muslims, and while it happens they’ll be patting one another on the back and congratulating themselves on how tolerant and inclusive they are. *spit”
I detest cowardice and apathy dressed as tolerance.
UPDATE: ‘Mystery refugees a secret
The Government claims national security could be at risk if it has to reveal where a “mystery” 150 refugees it has accepted under a secret category came from.’
Yep…the Kiwi taxpayer’s job is to fund them, to shut up and to trust that nice Mr. Key and his U.N. masters. Serfs don’t need to know the details.